• Become a Premium Member today!

    Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Why become a Premium Member?

    • Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts.
    • Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    Become a Premium Member today and experience HomebuiltAirplanes.com to the fullest!

    Upgrade Now

Biplane cellule empennage

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Autodidact

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
4,511
Location
Oklahoma
Biplane cellule horizontal tail surfaces; does anyone know of a good technical paper or article concerning this archaic type of tail surface? Some fairly good aircraft used them, such as the Handley-Page HP42, Vickers Vimy and others, even though some of the very earliest designs, like the Bleriot 11, and Wright Model B had monoplane horizontal tail surfaces. The idea that it was difficult to make them strong enough as monoplane surfaces doesn't make sense to me because they could be wire braced and have no more unsupported length than the main-plane bays between the inter-plane struts. I know that they are draggy and inefficient, so why were they used? Was it strength issues after all (early monoplanes had a reputation as structurally weak)? What effect did they have on control and stability? Again, any good literature on this that anyone knows of off the top of their head?
 
Back
Top